Scholarly article
Comparing Empathy for Wildlife Across the Animal Kingdom
Nicole M. Ardoin, Alison W. Bowers, Marta M. Burnet, Wilson Sherman
September 2025
September 2025
While conventional wisdom suggests people feel higher levels of empathy for certain animal groups, research shows mixed findings that do not always align with what’s expected. Charismatic species are animals whose appealing traits inspire people to care about them and want to support their conservation, yet visitors sometimes express stronger emotional connections with fish, birds, and invertebrates, which often are not thought of as charismatic species. This disconnect between assumptions and reality raises questions for institutions working to foster meaningful human-wildlife connections and provided this review with it’s guiding question: How does human empathy for animals vary across different groups of animals and what factors and strategies influence these empathy responses?
This review and practitioner guide includes a summary of the research landscape on this topic, the factors that influence empathy differences, and translates the research findings into actionable strategies for zoo and aquarium professionals.
Download Resource (pdf)Tags:
This practitioners’ guide explores the most current research on the relationship between empathy and conservation action.
This study explores how tourists connect to wildlife, and researches the differences of these experiences from a zoo versus a safari
This review examines empathy in relation with non-human animals, offers a multi-species definition for empathy, and identifies key components for empathy development.
Join us in fostering empathy for animals and people, and taking conservation actions.